State v. Hoeffel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \there appears to be little support for the use of civil judgments as evidence of the facts found\ and listing policy reasons for this rule
• stating that “[i]ntent can be proved 5 1 by circumstantial evidence” alone
• stating that “[i]ntent can be proved by circumstantial evidence”
• “Intent can be proved by circumstantial 14 evidence.”
• “Intent can be proved by circumstantial 12 evidence.”
• “Intent can be proved 2 by circumstantial evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).