Skip to main content

State v. Kirn

Citations

  • 767 P.2d 1238
  • 70 Haw. 206
  • 1989 Haw. LEXIS 5
  • 1989 WL 5732

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that results of in-toxilizer test lacked proper foundation for admission because the test was conducted contrary to procedure stated in the administrative rules
  • holding that results of intoxilizer test lacked proper foundation for admission because the test was conducted contrary to procedure stated in the administrative rules
  • for interlocutory appeal purposes, the state may appeal the pretrial suppression of breath test results deemed obtained in violation of an administrative rule
  • suppression may be appropriate for violation of constitution, statute, or administrative regulation
  • suppression may be appropriate for violation of constitution, statute, or administrative regulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lum, Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi, Wakatsuki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.