Connecticut Appellate Court· 9/13/1988
State v. Smith
Citations
- 16 Conn. App. 156
- 547 A.2d 69
- 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 346
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating the “continuous observation” requirement did not “require that an officer fix his unswerving gaze upon a subject during each fifteen minute interval prior to administration of a breath test”
- stating the \continuous observation\ requirement did not \require that an officer fix his unswerving gaze upon a subject during each fifteen minute interval prior to administration of a breath test\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dupont
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Fisher v. City of EuporaMississippi Supreme Court· 1991-09-18· cited 65×
- State v. LammeConnecticut Appellate Court· 1989-09-05· cited 58×
- Manriquez v. GourleyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-01-31· cited 51×
- State v. GardnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-09-11· cited 50×
- State v. RemsburgIdaho Court of Appeals· 1994-10-06· cited 22×
- State v. ScottConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-09-13· cited 17×
- Patricia S. Reed, Comm., W. Va. DMV v. Jeffrey HillWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2015-02-27· cited 14×
- State v. FilsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2009-02-17· cited 13×
- State v. PiorkowskiConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-03-21· cited 12×
- State v. ComolloConnecticut Appellate Court· 1990-04-10· cited 10×
- State v. MorelliConnecticut Appellate Court· 1991-08-27· cited 9×
- Peterson v. Wyoming Department of Transportation, Drivers' License DivisionWyoming Supreme Court· 2007-05-30· cited 8×
- State v. CashNebraska Court of Appeals· 1995-01-10· cited 7×
- State v. DessoConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-09-13· cited 7×
- Price-Crowley v. KozlowskiConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-07-21· cited 7×
- State v. MashekCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-11-13· cited 5×
- People v. ChiaravalleAppellate Court of Illinois· 2015-01-23· cited 4×
- State v. GarrityConnecticut Appellate Court· 1989-01-24· cited 4×
- State v. PoirierConnecticut Appellate Court· 1989-07-04· cited 4×
- Hadaway v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2011-07-22
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. RoqueSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-05-17· cited 131×
- State v. ClementeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-07-02· cited 117×
- State v. MaderaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-12-17· cited 114×
- State v. Chong ChungSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-01-13· cited 77×
- Szarwak v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-07-23· cited 66×
- In Re Appeal of DattiloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1950-03-07· cited 48×
- State v. WatermanConnecticut Appellate Court· 1986-05-13· cited 40×
- State v. HancichSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-07-29· cited 39×
- Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-08-28· cited 30×
- State v. ScottConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-09-13· cited 17×
- State v. DessoConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-09-13· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.