Skip to main content

State v. McCaslin

Citations

  • 894 S.W.2d 310
  • 1994 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 732

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that being in the presence of the officer while in the backseat of the patrol car did not meet the fourth Sensing prerequisite
  • holding that being in the presence of the officer while in the backseat of the patrol car did not satisfy the twenty-minute observation prerequisite
  • the \undisputed period of observation ... of sixteen minutes\ was insufficient to meet the twenty minutes observation requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peay, Jones, Tipton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.