Supreme Court of Vermont· 4/14/1995
State v. Fuller
Citations
- 660 A.2d 302
- 163 Vt. 523
- 1995 Vt. LEXIS 51
- 1995 WL 242393
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that it is inappropriate to expand statute by implication by replacing legislative silence with policy
- stating that in pari materia is statutory rule of construction “to be relied upon where appropriate . . . but not where it leads to a result not consistent with legislative intent” (citations omitted)
- stating that in pari materia is statutory rule of construction “to be relied upon where appropriate . . . but not where it leads to a result not consistent with legislative intent” (citations omitted)
- stating that it is inappropriate to expand a statute by implication by reading into it something that is not there, unless doing so is necessary to make the statute effective
- it is inappropriate to expand statute by implication by reading into it something not there, unless it is necessary to make statute effective
- it is inappropriate to expand statute by implication by reading into it something not there, unless it is necessary to make statute effective
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Gibson, Dooley, Morse, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tarrant v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont· 1999-04-09· cited 92×
- State v. O'NEILLSupreme Court of Vermont· 1996-06-14· cited 69×
- State v. LeBlancSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-07-14· cited 24×
- State v. BaronSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-02-27· cited 23×
- State v. Kent Richland, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2015-09-18· cited 22×
- Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of Vermont· 1998-05-08· cited 20×
- State v. BeriniSupreme Court of Vermont· 1997-07-28· cited 18×
- Rock v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont· 1999-09-10· cited 14×
- State v. GilmanSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-11-09· cited 12×
- State v. Christopher D. HaleSupreme Court of Vermont· 2021-03-26· cited 12×
- Depot Square Pizzeria, LLC v. Dep't of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont· 2017-05-19· cited 9×
- State v. NemkovichSupreme Court of Vermont· 1998-05-01· cited 7×
- State v. Julianne GrahamSupreme Court of Vermont· 2016-04-29· cited 5×
- In re K.A., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont· 2016-04-29· cited 4×
- Founder's Hall Act 250 Appeal - Decision on MotionVermont Superior Court· 2020-02-06
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Vermont· 1981-12-10· cited 66×
- In Re PreseaultSupreme Court of Vermont· 1972-06-06· cited 55×
- State v. CaronSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-12-21· cited 50×
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-10-21· cited 48×
- State v. WestSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-10-21· cited 38×
- State v. LombardSupreme Court of Vermont· 1985-12-06· cited 35×
- State v. DuffSupreme Court of Vermont· 1978-11-03· cited 32×
- Finberg v. MurnaneSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-12-18· cited 29×
- State v. JacobsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1984-01-13· cited 27×
- Veilleux v. SpringerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1973-01-05· cited 25×
- Board of Trustees of Kellogg-Hubbard Library, Inc. v. Labor Relations Board & Local 1369Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-09-30· cited 22×
- State v. GarveySupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-05-31· cited 20×
- State v. GraceySupreme Court of Vermont· 1981-09-01· cited 13×
- State v. HammSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-09-18· cited 12×
- State v. DesjardinsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1984-06-08· cited 10×
- State v. PellerinSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-12-17· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.