Supreme Court of Vermont· 1/13/1984
State v. Jacobs
Citations
- 472 A.2d 1247
- 144 Vt. 70
- 1984 Vt. LEXIS 416
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that it is not “a legitimate function of this Court to expand a statute by implication, that is, by reading into it something which is not there, unless it is necessary in order to make it effective”
- explaining that this Court will not “expand a statute by implication, that is, by reading into it something which is not there, unless it is necessary in order to make it effective”
- explaining that it is inappropriate “to expand a statute by implication, that is, by reading into it something which is not there, unless it is necessary in order to make it effective”
- explaining that it is inappropriate “to expand a statute by implication, that is, by reading into it something which is not there, unless it is necessary in order to make it effective”
- declining to adopt specific standards for transfer to juvenile court under § 635(b) because it is not a \legitimate function of this Court to expand a statute by implication ... unless it is necessary in order to make it effective\
- declining to adopt specific standards for transfer to juvenile court under § 635(b) because it is not a “legitimate function of this Court to expand a statute by implication . . . unless it is necessary in order to make it effective”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Billings, Hill, Underwood, Peck, Gibson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Langle v. KurkulSupreme Court of Vermont· 1986-01-24· cited 115×
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Vermont· 1985-03-22· cited 71×
- State v. LafayetteSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-07-24· cited 35×
- Hansen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1995-10-18· cited 31×
- State v. LeBlancSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-07-14· cited 24×
- State v. FullerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-04-14· cited 21×
- Hartnett v. Union Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-11-17· cited 20×
- Kade v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont· 2006-06-05· cited 15×
- Town of Pawlet v. Daniel BanyaiSupreme Court of Vermont· 2022-01-14· cited 14×
- State v. BuelowSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-12-14· cited 13×
- Dubaniewicz v. HoumanSupreme Court of Vermont· 2006-09-15· cited 13×
- Sawyer v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-05-01· cited 12×
- State v. LafayetteSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-07-07· cited 11×
- State v. SmailSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-04-07· cited 7×
- Menapace v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1989-01-19· cited 6×
- State v. Michael RosenfieldSupreme Court of Vermont· 2016-02-26· cited 5×
- In re R.D.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-04-06· cited 4×
- State v. BarretteSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-01-12· cited 3×
- In Re RDSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-04-06
- Brown v. Department of Social WelfareSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-12-15
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-03-22· cited 2,202×
- Krupp v. KruppSupreme Court of Vermont· 1967-12-05· cited 79×
- Murphy Motor Sales v. First Nat. Bank of St. JohnsburySupreme Court of Vermont· 1960-11-01· cited 26×
- State v. PowersSupreme Court of Vermont· 1978-04-04· cited 14×
- Maurice Callahan & Sons, Inc. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Vermont· 1965-10-05· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.