Skip to main content
· 12/18/1992

Finberg v. Murnane

Citations

  • 623 A.2d 979
  • 159 Vt. 431
  • 1992 Vt. LEXIS 211

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that identify and motive of requestor are irrelevant to evaluation of exemption
  • “To the extent the information came from a non-confidential source, it is subject to disclosure even if it also came from a confidential source.”
  • “Motive is irrelevant to plaintiff’s [PRA] access right.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Gibson, Dooley, Morse, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.