Supreme Court of Vermont· 5/8/1998
Harris v. Harris
Citations
- 714 A.2d 626
- 168 Vt. 13
- 1998 Vt. LEXIS 160
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that while court may adopt methodology of extrapolation from guidelines, it is not required to do so
- “Obviously, reducing discrepancies between child support orders is more readily achievable when the guidelines apply than when they do not.”
- needs of affluent children grow along with their parents’ good fortune
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amestoy, Gibson, Dooley, Morse, Allen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Downing v. DowningCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2001-04-06· cited 64×
- Moulds v. BradleyMississippi Supreme Court· 2001-08-02· cited 44×
- Nash v. NashCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-07-23· cited 30×
- Golden v. Cooper-EllisSupreme Court of Vermont· 2007-03-02· cited 25×
- Adamson v. DodgeSupreme Court of Vermont· 2002-11-01· cited 25×
- Hanson-Metayer v. Hanson-MetayerSupreme Court of Vermont· 2013-04-12· cited 24×
- Smith v. FreemanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-12-26· cited 23×
- Coyle v. CoyleSupreme Court of Vermont· 2007-03-14· cited 9×
- Mitchinson v. MitchinsonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-10-29· cited 5×
- Morancy v. MorancySupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-12-21· cited 2×
- Eric Shannon Moulds v. Bridget Bushay Fairley BradleyMississippi Supreme Court· 1999-05-13
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Nash v. MulleTennessee Supreme Court· 1993-01-19· cited 97×
- Voishan v. PalmaCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-07-22· cited 61×
- In Re the Marriage NimmoSupreme Court of Colorado· 1995-03-13· cited 40×
- Ochs v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-10-11· cited 38×
- Nevitt v. NevittSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-11-30· cited 38×
- Gates v. GatesSupreme Court of Vermont· 1998-03-27· cited 38×
- Duke v. DukeSupreme Court of Vermont· 1982-02-04· cited 33×
- Bagley v. BagleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-11-01· cited 32×
- In Re the Marriage of PattersonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1996-06-21· cited 31×
- Kilduff v. WilleySupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-11-23· cited 31×
- Ely v. ElySupreme Court of Vermont· 1981-02-03· cited 27×
- Ainsworth v. AinsworthSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-03-16· cited 26×
- Loeb v. LoebSupreme Court of Vermont· 1958-09-02· cited 25×
- Archer v. ArcherCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 1991-04-02· cited 23×
- Schmitt v. SchmittNebraska Supreme Court· 1991-12-06· cited 23×
- Towne v. TowneSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-07-15· cited 23×
- Grimes v. GrimesSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-11-06· cited 21×
- State v. FullerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-04-14· cited 21×
- Galbis v. NadalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-06-10· cited 20×
- Babka v. BabkaNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-03-09· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.