Supreme Court of Vermont· 12/6/1985
State v. Lombard
Citations
- 505 A.2d 1182
- 146 Vt. 411
- 1985 Vt. LEXIS 390
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that police did not violate defendant’s right to reasonably private consultation by staying nearby while defendant spoke to his attorney at pay phone
- arresting officer’s ability to overhear accused’s telephone conversation with his attorney was not a violation of statutory right to counsel
- disapproving police conduct that effectively prevents arrestees from freely communicating with their attorneys in private
- Legislature concerned that any decision to take breath test not be lightly decided, and therefore, provided for consultation with counsel prior to making of decision
- Legislature concerned that any decision to take breath test not be lightly decided, and therefore, provided for consultation with counsel prior to making of decision
- prosecution’s failure to disclose witness under V.R.Cr.P. 16 “‘must be coupled with established prejudice to produce error’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Hill, Peck, Gibson, Hayes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. WestSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-10-21· cited 38×
- Pfeil v. Rutland District CourtSupreme Court of Vermont· 1986-08-01· cited 35×
- State v. FullerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-04-14· cited 21×
- City of Mandan v. JewettNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-06-15· cited 20×
- State v. DuvalSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-02-15· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. HayesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-04-17· cited 16×
- State v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Vermont· 2002-04-19· cited 15×
- State v. SchmittSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-10-21· cited 15×
- State v. ZumboSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-11-08· cited 15×
- State v. DegnanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-08-12· cited 12×
- State v. PeeleSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-02-06· cited 11×
- State v. NemkovichSupreme Court of Vermont· 1998-05-01· cited 7×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-10-07· cited 7×
- State v. FredetteSupreme Court of Vermont· 1997-11-17· cited 7×
- Commonwealth v. WestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-01-25· cited 6×
- State v. IronsideSupreme Court of Vermont· 1998-03-25· cited 5×
- State v. PowersSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-05-07· cited 5×
- State v. WadeSupreme Court of Vermont· 2003-10-28· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. Neary-FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2016-08-15· cited 4×
- State v. Paul AikenSupreme Court of Vermont· 2015-08-07· cited 3×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-06-07· cited 3,001×
- State v. NewtonOregon Supreme Court· 1981-10-27· cited 146×
- State v. BristorSupreme Court of Kansas· 1984-11-30· cited 45×
- State v. PetkusSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1970-09-08· cited 41×
- People v. RamirezSupreme Court of Colorado· 1980-03-31· cited 40×
- State v. JonesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1983-03-17· cited 34×
- State v. WelchSupreme Court of Vermont· 1978-10-05· cited 32×
- State v. DaceySupreme Court of Vermont· 1980-06-27· cited 31×
- State v. MecierSupreme Court of Vermont· 1980-02-05· cited 20×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Vermont· 1976-02-04· cited 17×
- Meacham v. Kawasaki Motors Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1980-09-11· cited 12×
- Zinn v. Tobin Packing Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1981-11-05· cited 11×
- State v. ConnarnSupreme Court of Vermont· 1980-04-08· cited 11×
- Copelin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1981-10-15· cited 8×
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of Vermont· 1983-09-06· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.