Skip to main content

State v. LeBlanc

Citations

  • 759 A.2d 991
  • 171 Vt. 88
  • 2000 Vt. LEXIS 176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Legislature knows how to incorporate terms into statute and that, when such terms are omitted, we presume Legislature intended to do so
  • explaining that Legislature knows how to incorporate terms into statute and that, when such terms are omitted, we presume Legislature intended to do so
  • explaining that this Court will not expand statute by implication unless necessary to make statute effective
  • declining to expand language of 23 V.S.A. § 1210(d) by adding words Legislature intentionally omitted
  • Court will not expand a statute “by adding words that we presume the Legislature intentionally omitted”
  • “If the Legislature intended for the savings clause to apply to third or subsequent convictions, it knew how to so specify.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amestoy, Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Skoglund

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.