Supreme Court of Connecticut· 12/16/1980
State v. Frye
Citations
- 182 Conn. 476
- 438 A.2d 735
- 1980 Conn. LEXIS 1012
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- utilizing for state law purposes definition of unavailability contained in rule 804 of Federal Rules of Evidence
- leaving subpoena with witness' wife at his abode without proof that witness knew contents of subpoena, although he confirmed by telephone that he had received it, was not adequate service under § 52-143
- to witness’ apartment, left subpoena with wife with instructions for witness to call; insufficient in absence of effort to serve witness
- to witness' apartment, left subpoena with wife with instructions for witness to call; insufficient in absence of effort to serve witness
- ‘‘declarant witness may be considered unavailable . . . [if] the witness has a lack of memory’’
- “necessity factor . . . is reflected in the prerequisite that the declarant be unavailable”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cotter, Bogdanski, Peters, Healey, Parskey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-03-03· cited 182×
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-14· cited 122×
- State v. SchiappaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-03-23· cited 122×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-08-04· cited 93×
- State v. BryantSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-03-24· cited 88×
- State v. DuntzSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-07-28· cited 81×
- State v. AillonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-03-03· cited 73×
- State v. LapointeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-16· cited 70×
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-05-21· cited 62×
- New England Savings Bank v. Bedford Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-08-13· cited 57×
- State v. RosadoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-04-02· cited 53×
- State v. RiveraSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-01-28· cited 46×
- State v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-06-12· cited 45×
- Schaffer v. LindyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1986-07-08· cited 42×
- State v. MayetteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-08-04· cited 33×
- In Re Tayler F.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-06-08· cited 32×
- State v. LynchConnecticut Appellate Court· 1990-05-01· cited 30×
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-08-20· cited 25×
- Feaster v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-11-16· cited 23×
- Reilly v. DiBiancoConnecticut Appellate Court· 1986-03-25· cited 23×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- United States v. David Guillette and Robert JoostSecond Circuit· 1976-12-20· cited 203×
- United States v. Jose Luis Oropeza and Mark James MintonNinth Circuit· 1977-11-08· cited 128×
- State v. GoldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-05-15· cited 118×
- DiPalma v. WiesenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1972-06-26· cited 83×
- State v. DeFreitasSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-01-08· cited 70×
- Henson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-02-13· cited 44×
- Ferguson v. SmazerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1963-12-03· cited 29×
- People v. FosterAppellate Court of Illinois· 1978-12-13· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.