Supreme Court of Connecticut· 8/20/1996
State v. Lopez
Citations
- 239 Conn. 56
- 681 A.2d 950
- 1996 Conn. LEXIS 320
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[a] proponent’s burden is to demonstrate a diligent and reasonable effort, not to do everything conceivable, to secure the witness’ presence”
- “it is within the discretion of the trial court to accept or to reject the proponent’s representations regarding the unavailability of a declarant and the trial court’s ruling will generally not be disturbed unless the court has abused its discretion”
- \it is within the discretion of the trial court to accept or to reject the proponent's representations regarding the unavailability of a declarant and the trial court's ruling will generally not be disturbed unless the court has abused its discretion\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Callahan, Katz, Peters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-03-03· cited 182×
- Binette v. SaboSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-03-10· cited 161×
- State v. SchiappaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-03-23· cited 122×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-08-04· cited 93×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-12-31· cited 88×
- State v. RiveraSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-04-06· cited 85×
- Skakel v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-04-20· cited 37×
- In Re Tayler F.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-06-08· cited 32×
- State v. ChristianHawaii Supreme Court· 1998-11-10· cited 28×
- Morant v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-02-12· cited 23×
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-08-15· cited 18×
- State v. LebrickSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-01-28· cited 17×
- State v. WrightConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-04-15· cited 14×
- State v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-12-21· cited 14×
- State v. Michael T.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2019-12-03· cited 10×
- State v. BryantConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-02-06· cited 10×
- State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-08-30· cited 7×
- Ferris v. FafordConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-02-14· cited 6×
- State v. LopezConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-07-13· cited 3×
- State v. Freeman (Dissent)Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-08-30
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-07· cited 301×
- United States v. David Guillette and Robert JoostSecond Circuit· 1976-12-20· cited 203×
- United States v. Christos Potamitis, Eddie Argitakos, and Steve ArgitakosSecond Circuit· 1984-07-10· cited 169×
- United States v. Jose Luis Oropeza and Mark James MintonNinth Circuit· 1977-11-08· cited 128×
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-14· cited 122×
- State v. GoldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-05-15· cited 118×
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-01-11· cited 100×
- State v. OnofrioSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-09-04· cited 97×
- State v. BolesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-18· cited 89×
- State v. BryantSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-03-24· cited 88×
- State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-06-11· cited 86×
- United States v. Luis Alvaro HoyosNinth Circuit· 1978-04-24· cited 81×
- State v. DuntzSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-07-28· cited 81×
- State v. AillonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-03-03· cited 73×
- State v. DeFreitasSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-01-08· cited 70×
- State v. NielsenOregon Supreme Court· 1993-06-17· cited 62×
- State v. StallingsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1966-11-29· cited 61×
- State v. RosadoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-04-02· cited 53×
- State v. FryeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-12-16· cited 47×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.