Supreme Court of Connecticut· 5/21/1991
State v. Payne
Citations
- 219 Conn. 93
- 591 A.2d 1246
- 1991 Conn. LEXIS 269
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- agreeing with trial court’s conclusion that long-standing relationship between defendant and witness would not lead to conclusion of trustworthiness
- agreeing with trial court’s conclusion that long-standing relationship between defendant and witness would not lead to conclusion of trustworthiness
- trial court’s improper admission of evidence of attempt to commit second robbery was likely to excite passions of jurors and, therefore, was harmful
- \we recognize the potential for suggestiveness inherent in an arraignment identification\
- less than one month between the crime and the identification
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Covello, Hull, Santaniello
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-23· cited 275×
- State v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-22· cited 166×
- State v. PinnockSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-01-14· cited 150×
- State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-15· cited 114×
- State v. ColtonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-17· cited 112×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-12-17· cited 107×
- State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-05-28· cited 96×
- State v. SawyerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-08-08· cited 94×
- State v. BolesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-18· cited 89×
- State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-11-13· cited 88×
- State v. MerriamSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-07-15· cited 88×
- State v. SaurisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-24· cited 81×
- Ann Howard's Apricots Restaurant, Inc. v. Commission On Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-05-28· cited 78×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-03-16· cited 76×
- State v. CrosswellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-04· cited 53×
- State v. CavellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-01-23· cited 46×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Vermont· 1996-01-12· cited 44×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1994-09-23· cited 40×
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-09-04· cited 40×
- State v. UlenConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-04-13· cited 38×
Cites
68 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Morris v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-05· cited 432×
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-07· cited 301×
- State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-07-17· cited 255×
- State v. VitaleSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-09-10· cited 160×
- State v. JohnSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-04-11· cited 139×
- State v. FalbySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-05-04· cited 129×
- State v. RuthSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-06-10· cited 127×
- State v. GaynorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-12-16· cited 123×
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-14· cited 122×
- Velasquez-Mercado v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-10-02· cited 122×
- State v. GoldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-05-15· cited 118×
- State v. RamsundarSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-06-09· cited 115×
- State v. VilalastraSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-04-05· cited 110×
- State v. BramanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-12-27· cited 106×
- State v. TheriaultSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-11-25· cited 102×
- State v. DelossantosSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-05-23· cited 101×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.