Skip to main content

State v. Rivera

Citations

  • 221 Conn. 58
  • 602 A.2d 571
  • 1992 Conn. LEXIS 10

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering that there was no evidence declarant repeated statement to anyone else and testified to the contrary at probable cause hearing
  • considering that there was no evidence declarant repeated statement to anyone else and testified to the contrary at probable cause hearing
  • sibling relationship did not establish close and confidential relationship where brothers did not grow up together or get along well, and where one brother had burglarized other brother’s apartment
  • finding declarant’s confession to brother did not meet relationship element of test because of evidence that they did not get along well, they did not grow up together, and declarant burglarized brother’s apartment
  • “we note that the language in Geyer suggesting that the crime be referred to as an ‘unspecified’ felony conviction is permissive not mandatory”
  • \we note that the language in Geyer suggesting that the crime be referred to as an `unspecified' felony conviction is permissive not mandatory\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Covello

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.