State v. Elwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[T]he primary intention behind section 56-5-2953 was to reduce the number of DUI trials heard as swearing contests by mandating the State videotape important events in the process of collecting DUI evidence.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Elwell
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-05-29· cited 23×
• State v. Hercheck
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-05-29· cited 9×
• State v. Kinard
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-06-19· cited 5×
• Hunts Along v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-12-06
• State v. Kenneth Taylor
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2022-02-23
• State v. Phillip W. Lowery
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2024-07-17

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-07-26· cited 1,327×
• State v. Sweat
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-01-25· cited 76×
• Town of Mt. Pleasant v. Roberts
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-07-11· cited 68×
• State v. Winkler
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-08-16· cited 29×
• State v. Parker
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-07-10· cited 26×
• State v. Baker
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-02-22· cited 18×
• State v. Carmack
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-05-24· cited 16×
• State v. Long
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-03-21· cited 11×
• State v. Branham
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-03-02· cited 8×