Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2/22/1993
State v. Baker
Citations
- 427 S.E.2d 670
- 310 S.C. 510
- 1993 S.C. LEXIS 45
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A statute as a whole must receive a practical, reasonable, and fair interpretation consonant with the purpose, design, and policy of the lawmakers.”
- statute as a whole, must receive a practical, reasonable, and fair interpretation consonant with the purpose, design, and policy of the lawmakers
- statute as a whole must receive a practical, reasonable, and fair interpretation consonant with the purpose, design, and policy of the lawmakers
- “A statute as a whole must receive a practical, reasonable, and fair interpretation consonant -with the purpose, design, and policy of the lawmakers.”
- Davis Adv. Sh. No. 5 at 35
- Davis Adv. Sh. No. 12 at 20
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harwell, Chandler, Toal, Moore, McKeller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-17· cited 485×
- Roche v. Young Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-08-10· cited 32×
- State v. ElwellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-05-29· cited 23×
- Peake v. South Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-11-27· cited 12×
- State v. BenjaminSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-04-07· cited 12×
- Busby v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-04-13· cited 12×
- State v. ElwellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-11-23· cited 8×
- City of Columbia v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-04-17· cited 5×
- State v. TisdaleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-02-05· cited 4×
- State v. StacyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-06-07· cited 4×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-01-02· cited 4×
- State v. KimbrellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-02-10· cited 4×
- State v. BullCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-04-22· cited 3×
- Clemmons v. Lowe's Home CentersSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-03-08
- Cricket Store 17 v. City of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-08-07
- In re Steven S.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-07-19
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Browning Ex Rel. Estate of Browning v. HartvigsenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-01-27· cited 63×
- Murphy v. HaganSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-09-30· cited 51×
- People v. CulpSupreme Court of Colorado· 1975-06-23· cited 21×
- State v. BarrySupreme Court of Kansas· 1958-12-06· cited 15×
- State v. SquiresSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-12-21· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.