Supreme Court of South Carolina· 3/21/2005
State v. Long
Citations
- 610 S.E.2d 809
- 363 S.C. 360
- 2005 S.C. LEXIS 91
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The legislature is presumed to intend that its statutes accomplish something.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pleicones, Toal, Moore, Waller, Burnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SweatCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-06-10· cited 31×
- S.C. Department of Motor Vehicles v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-05-23· cited 25×
- Bolin v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-11-12· cited 17×
- Peake v. South Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-11-27· cited 12×
- State v. ElwellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-11-23· cited 8×
- State v. CuevasCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-06-20· cited 3×
- Atkins v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-03-09· cited 1×
- State v. Tammy Dianne BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2022-05-04
- South Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-01-08
- State v. GermanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-04-05
- State v. GermanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-04-21
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.