State v. Kinard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[T]he requirement that the arrest and Miranda reading be videotaped serves to protect the rights of the defendant.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Kinard
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-03-18
• State v. Kenneth Taylor
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2022-02-23
• State v. Phillip Wayne Lowery
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2022-04-06

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mid-State Auto Auction of Lexington, Inc. v. Altman
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-09-03· cited 93×
• Town of Mt. Pleasant v. Roberts
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-07-11· cited 68×
• Broadhurst v. City of Myrtle Beach Election Commission
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-08-28· cited 50×
• Hinton v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-01-12· cited 27×
• State v. Elwell
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-05-29· cited 23×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-12-14· cited 22×
• Lancaster County Bar Ass'n v. South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-12-08· cited 18×
• State v. Garris
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-08-10· cited 18×
• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-12-23· cited 14×
• State v. Henkel
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-07-01· cited 10×
• State v. Elwell
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-11-23· cited 8×
• State v. Sawyer
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-11-05· cited 5×
• Teamer v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-04-13· cited 4×