Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 3/2/2011
State v. Branham
Citations
- 708 S.E.2d 806
- 392 S.C. 225
- 2011 S.C. App. LEXIS 31
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defining the requirement to produce a video recording as requiring only that a video recording be created
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Geathers, Pieper, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 4,383×
- Jones v. LottSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-04-19· cited 106×
- State v. SweatSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-01-25· cited 76×
- City of Rock Hill v. SuchenskiSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-06-18· cited 56×
- State v. TyndallCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-05-24· cited 46×
- United States v. David DriverSeventh Circuit· 1986-10-30· cited 39×
- Porter v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-05-01· cited 34×
- Gibson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-03-08· cited 34×
- Harris v. Anderson County Sheriff's OfficeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-02-09· cited 20×
- State v. NewellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-01-07· cited 17×
- State v. LandonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-08-21· cited 15×
- Riddle v. OzmintSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-05-22· cited 9×
- State v. GallowayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-07-22· cited 9×
- Binney v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-09-21· cited 6×
- State v. HicksSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-05-03· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.