State v. Dykstra

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating: \A residential front porch may be considered a lawful vantage point if it is a natural access route to the residence and impliedly open to the public.\
• stating: “A residential front porch may be considered a lawful vantage point if it is a natural access route to the residence and impUedly open to the pubUc.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Kitchen
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-01-20· cited 64×
• State v. Thorson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-12-20· cited 10×
• State v. Hoggatt
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-08-31· cited 7×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Smith v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 2,305×
• State v. Hendrickson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 744×
• State v. Hill
  Washington Supreme Court· 1994-03-17· cited 742×
• State v. Myrick
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-09-13· cited 276×
• State v. Seagull
  Washington Supreme Court· 1981-07-30· cited 263×
• State v. Chrisman
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-01-26· cited 165×
• State v. Maxfield
  Washington Supreme Court· 1994-12-08· cited 108×
• State v. Myers
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-09-05· cited 96×
• State v. Daugherty
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-09-11· cited 88×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-09-07· cited 70×
• State v. Rose
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-01-11· cited 67×
• State v. Hansen
  Washington Supreme Court· 1986-12-04· cited 16×
• State v. Hansen
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-02-04· cited 12×