Washington Supreme Court· 9/5/1991

State v. Myers

Citations

815 P.2d 761
117 Wash. 2d 332
1991 Wash. LEXIS 333

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that whether a police officer enters a premises during the daylight hours is relevant in determining whether the scope of the implied consent has been exceeded
noting that whether a police officer enters a premises during the daylight hours is relevant in determining whether the scope of the implied consent has been exceeded
noting that whether - 17 - a police officer enters a premises during the daylight hours is relevant in determining whether the scope of an implied invitation to enter premises has been exceeded
noting that whether - 17 - a police officer enters a premises during the daylight hours is relevant in determining whether the scope of an implied invitation to enter premises has been exceeded
describing a number of article 1, section 7 requirements for the validity of a warrant
including the inadvertent discovery element under the plain view exception to the warrant requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.