Utah Supreme Court· 3/18/1993

State v. Dunn

Citations

850 P.2d 1201
208 Utah Adv. Rep. 100
1993 Utah LEXIS 54
1993 WL 79651

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “a party cannot take advantage of an error committed at trial when that party led the trial court into committing the error”
holding that if any of the requirements for plain error are not met, \plain error is not established\ and cannot be raised
holding that a petitioner's ineffective assistance claim failed because there was no basis in the law in effect at the time of the representation that would have substantiated petitioner's substantive claim
holding that “a party cannot take advantage of an error committed at trial when that party led the trial court into committing the error”
holding that any error was harmless where the jury had evidence of the accomplice's motivation to lie but received a general credibility instruction
recognizing that “[fjrom territorial days until 1980, Utah statutes expressly authorized this court to ‘reverse, affirm or modify the judgment or order appealed from’ that such “provision coexisted with section 76-1-402(5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zimmerman, Stewart, Hall, Howe, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

320 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

151 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Dunn

253 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.