West Virginia Supreme Court· 7/11/1978

State v. Dunn

Citations

246 S.E.2d 245
162 W. Va. 63
1978 W. Va. LEXIS 319

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding “[ojnly an 'intentional' or ‘knowing’ delivery of a controlled substance is prohibited by statute”
finding that a comment regarding the local drug culture did not rise to the level of reversible error, and stating that “[c]ontrary to defendant’s assertions, this is not a case like Peck v. Bez, 129 W. Va. 247, 40 S.E.2d 1 (1946
This Court also stated that improper remarks made by a prosecutor in a closing argument would not warrant reversal if the defendant was not prejudiced and if manifest injustice did not occur
This Court also stated that improper remarks made by a prosecutor in a closing argument would not warrant reversal if the defendant was not prejudiced and if manifest injustice did not occur
admission of photographic evidence rests in the sound discretion of the trial court
admission of photographic evidence rests in sound discretion of the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGraw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.