Missouri Court of Appeals· 10/5/1999
State v. Dunn
Citations
- 7 S.W.3d 427
- 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 1962
- 1999 WL 786341
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a “trace report,” which “[wa]s generated by a telephone company’s computer, [wa]s not hearsay”
- holding testimony of a Southwestern Bell employee was sufficient to establish the reliability of records from AT & T
- holding telephone records were not hearsay where testimony of telephone company security manager established the records were created by a fully electronic process
- holding that phone records may be admissible under the business record exception
- holding telephone records were not hearsay where testimony of telephone company security manager established the records were created by a fully electronic process
- reciting testimony of telephone company employee detailing how all long distance carriers receive and maintain billing records from other carriers and noting the process is entirely electronic with no direct human input
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Paul M. Spinden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lorraine v. Markel American InsuranceD. Maryland· 2007-05-04· cited 113×
- People v. HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-07-02· cited 67×
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Iowa· 2008-04-04· cited 53×
- State v. BradshawMissouri Court of Appeals· 2000-08-01· cited 27×
- State v. BewleyMissouri Court of Appeals· 2002-02-27· cited 19×
- State of Missouri v. LaTroy SandersMissouri Court of Appeals· 2016-02-16· cited 13×
- State v. ManleyMissouri Court of Appeals· 2013-09-24· cited 10×
- Miller v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2006-09-13· cited 9×
- State of Missouri v. Terrill E. ReynoldsMissouri Court of Appeals· 2015-03-10· cited 9×
- State v. BarbeeMissouri Court of Appeals· 2018-11-06· cited 8×
- State v. MendozaMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-10-07· cited 7×
- State v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals· 2010-05-04· cited 7×
- Baker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-07-06· cited 7×
- State of Missouri v. Carlton PorterMissouri Court of Appeals· 2015-06-16· cited 6×
- Taylor v. SteeleE.D. Missouri· 2019-03-31· cited 6×
- State v. MatsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 2017-08-22· cited 4×
- Moss v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2018-02-20· cited 3×
- State v. CourtneyMissouri Court of Appeals· 2008-07-28· cited 1×
- State v. GojcajConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-06-24
- Harold Miller v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2006-04-06
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. HallTennessee Supreme Court· 1998-09-21· cited 732×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri· 1995-07-25· cited 277×
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri· 1981-07-14· cited 167×
- State v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1997-12-23· cited 122×
- State v. TompkinsSupreme Court of Missouri· 1955-04-11· cited 39×
- State v. BakerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1993-04-06· cited 30×
- State v. ElliottMissouri Court of Appeals· 1999-01-26· cited 24×
- State v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Missouri· 1950-06-13· cited 20×
- State v. GaverMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-04-23· cited 18×
- State v. ModestCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-10-07· cited 17×
- State v. SavageLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1991-02-06· cited 12×
- Quarles v. Jackson Parish Police JuryLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1986-01-22· cited 12×
- State v. RosendahlMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-01-14· cited 8×
- State v. SpidleMissouri Court of Appeals· 1998-04-28· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.