Skip to main content

State v. Dunn

Citations

  • 7 S.W.3d 427
  • 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 1962
  • 1999 WL 786341

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a “trace report,” which “[wa]s generated by a telephone company’s computer, [wa]s not hearsay”
  • holding testimony of a Southwestern Bell employee was sufficient to establish the reliability of records from AT & T
  • holding telephone records were not hearsay where testimony of telephone company security manager established the records were created by a fully electronic process
  • holding that phone records may be admissible under the business record exception
  • holding telephone records were not hearsay where testimony of telephone company security manager established the records were created by a fully electronic process
  • reciting testimony of telephone company employee detailing how all long distance carriers receive and maintain billing records from other carriers and noting the process is entirely electronic with no direct human input

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paul M. Spinden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.