Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1/18/2008
State v. Dukes
Citations
- 174 P.3d 914
- 38 Kan. App. 2d 958
- 2008 Kan. App. LEXIS 13
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the introduction of driving records without a witness did not violate a defendant’s right to confrontation
- holding that the introduction in evidence of driving records does not offend Crawford because the records are maintained pursuant to state law and reflect ministerial duties unrelated to criminal prosecution
- ruling that a driving record is nontestimonial because the state is statutorily required to create and maintain driving records regardless of whether they become relevant to a later criminal investigation
- agreeing with courts in fourteen other jurisdictions that an affidavit verifying the maintenance and calibration of a breath test machine is nontesti-monial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marquardt, Leben, Kundson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DukesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2010-05-06· cited 104×
- People v. NunleyMichigan Court of Appeals· 2011-10-13· cited 97×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-05-03· cited 60×
- Commonwealth v. ZeiningerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2011-05-24· cited 40×
- Ramirez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-05-28· cited 24×
- State v. MurphySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2010-03-25· cited 20×
- State v. TaymanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2008-12-04· cited 20×
- People v. EspinozaColorado Court of Appeals· 2008-05-29· cited 19×
- State v. BensonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-11-09· cited 8×
- Millard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-03-12· cited 6×
- State v. WenzelCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-03-07· cited 4×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-04-28· cited 205×
- Luginbyhl v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2006-04-04· cited 117×
- State v. CaulfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-10-05· cited 113×
- State v. FischerNebraska Supreme Court· 2007-01-19· cited 92×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-12-07· cited 82×
- State v. KirkpatrickWashington Supreme Court· 2007-07-12· cited 70×
- State v. CarterMontana Supreme Court· 2005-04-05· cited 56×
- State v. KronichWashington Supreme Court· 2007-07-12· cited 55×
- State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-02-08· cited 50×
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-11-21· cited 48×
- Shiver v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-08· cited 44×
- Bohsancurt v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-02-28· cited 43×
- State v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-12-07· cited 38×
- Rackoff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-10-05· cited 28×
- Luginbyhl v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-08-30· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. WaltherKentucky Supreme Court· 2006-04-20· cited 23×
- Rembusch v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-11-08· cited 20×
- People v. So Young KimAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-11-16· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.