State v. Norman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the certifications do not resemble the classic kind of testimonial evidence at which the Confrontation Clause was aimed-ex parte examinations of witnesses intended to be used to convict a particular defendant
• documents supporting accuracy of Intoxilyzer machine “are more akin to hearsay statements that were not considered testimonial in nature at common law, such as public or business records”
• admission into evidence of certificates reflecting that Intoxilyzer 5000 had been tested for accuracy, without oral testimony of technicians who prepared them, did not violate defendant’s Sixth Amendment confrontation right
• admission into evidence of certificates reflecting that Intoxilyzer 5000 had been tested for accuracy, without oral testimony of technicians who prepared them, did not violate defendant's Sixth Amendment confrontation right
• certifications of accuracy of Intoxilyzer machine did not violate right of confrontation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• State v. Chun
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2008-03-17· cited 156×
• People v. Rawlins
  New York Court of Appeals· 2008-02-19· cited 126×
• State v. Kirkpatrick
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-07-12· cited 70×
• Bohsancurt v. Eisenberg
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-02-28· cited 43×
• United States v. Magyari
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2006-05-10· cited 41×
• Jarrell v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-08-24· cited 33×
• Rackoff v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2006-11-20· cited 31×
• State v. O'MALEY
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2007-09-05· cited 26×
• State v. Bergin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-09-23· cited 26×
• Ramirez v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2010-05-28· cited 24×
• Commonwealth v. Walther
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2006-04-20· cited 23×
• Wimbish v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2008-04-08· cited 17×
• People v. Lebrecht
  Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-07-27· cited 17×
• State v. Velykoretskykh
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-01-28· cited 16×
• State v. Dukes
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-01-18· cited 14×
• State v. Marshall
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2007-06-22· cited 13×
• Abyo v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2007-08-10· cited 11×
• State v. Warrington
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-05-07· cited 8×
• State v. Ruggles
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-08-29· cited 8×
• Salt Lake City v. George
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2008-07-03· cited 7×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Crawford v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
• Ohio v. Roberts
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
• State v. Campbell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1985-08-20· cited 124×
• State v. Carter
  Montana Supreme Court· 2005-04-05· cited 56×
• State v. MacK
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2004-11-26· cited 55×
• State v. Moore
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-07-11· cited 32×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-01-25· cited 31×
• Rackoff v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-10-05· cited 28×
• Luginbyhl v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-08-30· cited 25×
• Napier v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-01-06· cited 25×
• State v. Conway
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-11-14· cited 17×
• State v. Godshalk
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-05-26· cited 16×
• People v. Orpin
  Irondequoit Justice Court· 2005-05-18· cited 12×
• State v. William
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-04-20· cited 9×