Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2/28/2006
Bohsancurt v. Eisenberg
Citations
- 129 P.3d 471
- 212 Ariz. 182
- 2006 Ariz. App. LEXIS 26
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that calibration records qualify under the business records hearsay exception
- holding calibration records for breathalyzer machine were nontestimonial business records
- finding certifications are not testimonial because they are mandated by administrative rule and the calibration testing and recording is a type of routine daily task that is far removed from any concerns associated with the adversarial cireumstances surrounding investigations or arrests
- quality assurance records of Intoxilyzer 5000 used to test defendant's breath sample qualify as business records and are not testimonial under Crawford
- “The essence of a public record is that it is created by a public agency. But, when a public agent keeps records in the ordinary course of business of his or her employer, the records may still constitute business records.”
- “The essence of a public record is that it is created by a public agency. But, when a public agent keeps records in the ordinary course of business of his or her employer, the records may still constitute business records.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pelander, Howard, Vásquez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ChunSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2008-03-17· cited 156×
- State v. FischerNebraska Supreme Court· 2007-01-19· cited 92×
- State v. Fitzwater.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2010-03-03· cited 61×
- Commonwealth v. ZeiningerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2011-05-24· cited 40×
- Jarrell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-08-24· cited 33×
- State v. KilbaneOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-27· cited 33×
- Rackoff v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2006-11-20· cited 31×
- State v. ShipleySupreme Court of Iowa· 2008-07-18· cited 30×
- State v. O'MALEYSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2007-09-05· cited 26×
- Ramirez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-05-28· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. WaltherKentucky Supreme Court· 2006-04-20· cited 23×
- People v. So Young KimAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-11-16· cited 19×
- Wimbish v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2008-04-08· cited 17×
- People v. LebrechtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-07-27· cited 17×
- State v. DukesCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-01-18· cited 14×
- State v. MarshallHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2007-06-22· cited 13×
- Abyo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2007-08-10· cited 11×
- Pflieger v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-11· cited 10×
- State v. LaturnerCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2007-07-27· cited 10×
- State v. ShiversCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-06-28· cited 9×
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,508×
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court· 1943-03-01· cited 1,191×
- United States v. Paul v. OatesSecond Circuit· 1977-06-03· cited 472×
- United States v. Sean Lamont CromerSixth Circuit· 2004-11-30· cited 436×
- State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court· 2004-08-09· cited 424×
- United States v. Oscar Rosa, Vincent Lopez, Ricardo Rodriguez, Hector Hernandez, and Armando VelasquezSecond Circuit· 1993-12-03· cited 366×
- Michels v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2006-01-17· cited 124×
- State v. DedmanNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2004-11-17· cited 121×
- People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-06-24· cited 111×
- Commonwealth v. VerdeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-05-19· cited 110×
- United States v. Maria Orozco, United States of America v. Jose Liva-CoronaNinth Circuit· 1979-02-01· cited 102×
- United States v. Jerald Lee SimsNinth Circuit· 1980-04-30· cited 94×
- Moreno Denoso v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2005-02-03· cited 87×
- Mitchell v. GambleCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-03-31· cited 75×
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-08-31· cited 71×
- United States v. Christopher D. WilmerNinth Circuit· 1986-09-05· cited 59×
- United States v. Ronald Willet MetzgerSixth Circuit· 1985-12-13· cited 58×
- State v. CarterMontana Supreme Court· 2005-04-05· cited 56×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.