Skip to main content
· 2/28/2006

Bohsancurt v. Eisenberg

Citations

  • 129 P.3d 471
  • 212 Ariz. 182
  • 2006 Ariz. App. LEXIS 26

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that calibration records qualify under the business records hearsay exception
  • holding calibration records for breathalyzer machine were nontestimonial business records
  • finding certifications are not testimonial because they are mandated by administrative rule and the calibration testing and recording is a type of routine daily task that is far removed from any concerns associated with the adversarial cireumstances surrounding investigations or arrests
  • quality assurance records of Intoxilyzer 5000 used to test defendant's breath sample qualify as business records and are not testimonial under Crawford
  • “The essence of a public record is that it is created by a public agency. But, when a public agent keeps records in the ordinary course of business of his or her employer, the records may still constitute business records.”
  • “The essence of a public record is that it is created by a public agency. But, when a public agent keeps records in the ordinary course of business of his or her employer, the records may still constitute business records.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pelander, Howard, Vásquez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.