State v. Doak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that dismissal was not required where entire 13-month delay attributable to state was reasonably explained
• concluding that the state’s explanation for each period of delay was reasonable
• whether historical facts amount to consent to a particular delay for purposes of ORS 135.747 is reviewed as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Peterson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-26· cited 12×
• State v. McGee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-02-27· cited 5×
• State v. Hawkins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-07· cited 5×
• State v. McFarland
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-29· cited 4×
• State v. Cupp
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-07-24· cited 2×
• State v. Mercier
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-10-30· cited 2×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Johnson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-08-04· cited 87×
• State v. Emery
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-03-24· cited 62×
• State v. Johnson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-04-19· cited 52×
• State v. Myers
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-02-11· cited 27×
• State v. Garcia
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-08-30· cited 27×
• State v. Myers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-22· cited 20×
• State v. Bayer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-01· cited 19×
• State v. Lee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-03-24· cited 13×
• State v. Brunoe
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-03-22· cited 12×
• State v. Bayer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-12-23· cited 12×
• State v. Cunningham
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-11-18· cited 9×
• State v. Dixon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-11-19· cited 8×
• State v. McCrory
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-09-28· cited 3×