Court of Appeals of Oregon· 8/7/2014

State v. Hawkins

Citations

261 Or. App. 440
323 P.3d 463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that 22-month delay, where approximately five months of the delay were unexplained or unjustified, was not unreasonable in prosecution of felonies subject to three-year statute of limitations
concluding that unconsented delay of 22 months, five months of which were unjustified, was not unreasonable in prosecution of felonies and did “not approach” the three-year statute of limitations for the felonies charged
“[W]hen the state alleges that a defendant ‘used or threatened to use a firearm’ in the commission of a felony, the alleged use or threatened use of the firearm becomes an element of a new aggravated crime that must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
“[W]hen the state alleges that a defendant ‘used or threatened to use a firearm’ in the commission of a felony, the alleged use or threatened use of the firearm becomes an element of a new aggravated crime that must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Egan, Nakamoto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.