State v. LINH THAT CAM TON

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that dismissal was required where eight months of delay out of a total of 11.5 months attributable to the state was due to simple neglect
• holding that dismissal was required where eight months of delay out of a total of 11.5 months attributable to the state were due to simple neglect
• noting that, although “the 11.5-month delay technically does not exceed the outer limits of acceptability under the above standards, those standards strongly indicate that only a small minority of misdemeanor cases— two percent — should take longer than six months”
• eight-month period of unexplained delay was unreasonable when case “sort of slip[ped] through the cracks”
• eight months of unexplained delay was unreasonable where the delay occurred because the case “sort of slip [ped] through the cracks”
• eight months of unexplained delay was unreasonable under ORS 135.747 where the state offered no reasonable explanation for the delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).