State v. Humphery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Hills “does not support the conclusion that the trial court’s rulings regarding the admission of hearsay evidence [from an anonymous TIPS call] were erroneous in the present case”
• witness was not an accomplice as contemplated by the jury instruction; she had sex with the victim and directed him to drive to the place where he was killed, but she had no involvement in the robbeiy or murder in any way

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).