Supreme Court of Kansas· 2/19/2010

State v. Richardson

Citations

224 P.3d 553
290 Kan. 176
2010 Kan. LEXIS 101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

adopting Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1, 9-10, 119 S. Ct. 1827, 144 L. Ed. 2d 35 [1999]
utilizing a harmless error type framework when jury instruction is missing an element
instructions should have identified, defined moving violations forming basis for charge of felony fleeing, attempting to elude police officer
trial court has duty to “inform the jury of every essential element of the crime that is charged”
A trial judge has a duty to inform the jury of every essential element of a crime charged. Omission of an essential element in jury instructions is clearly erroneous and requires reversal of the conviction.
discretion not abused in refusing to appoint new counsel for defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.