Skip to main content

State v. Cofield

Citations

  • 203 P.3d 1261
  • 288 Kan. 367
  • 2009 Kan. LEXIS 49

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • although defendant reported using drugs, he gave detailed statement with explicit descriptions in response to open-ended questions
  • large number of shots fired; defendant, cohorts took loaded guns on car ride; victims vulnerable; defendant confessed he fired at victims
  • \One error is insufficient to support reversal under the cumulative effect rule.\
  • large number of gunshots 24 fired is relevant factor to establish premeditation
  • high number of gunshots fired is relevant factor to establish premeditation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.