Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1/19/1987

State v. Adams

Citations

352 S.E.2d 483
291 S.C. 132
1987 S.C. LEXIS 197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that “simple possession” involves an amount less than necessary to trigger the presumption of an intent to distribute
stating “that evidence of various drug paraphernalia and residue of controlled substances was sufficient to submit the case to the jury”
stating \that evidence of various drug paraphernalia and residue of controlled substances was sufficient to submit the case to the jury\
where error in instruction on lesser included offense cannot be considered harmless, the defendant is entitled to a new trial
agents seized large inventory of drug paraphernalia, residue, thirty guns, and $134,000 in cash
agents seized large inventory of drug paraphernalia, residue, thirty guns, and $134,000 in cash

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gregory, Ness, Chandler, Finney, Harwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.