Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 4/9/2007
State v. Rutledge
Citations
- 644 S.E.2d 789
- 373 S.C. 312
- 2007 S.C. App. LEXIS 55
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \An appellate court reviewing the decision to issue a search warrant should decide whether the magistrate had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed.\
- \An appellate court reviewing the decision to issue a search warrant should decide whether the magistrate had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed.\
- \A reviewing court should give great deference to a magistrate's determination of probable cause.\
- \A reviewing court should give great deference to a magistrate's determination of probable cause.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hearn, Goolsby, Stilwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- State v. 192 Coin-Operated Video Game MacHinesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-02-07· cited 46×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-08-21· cited 39×
- State v. BellamySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-06-28· cited 35×
- State v. PhilpotCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-01-30· cited 19×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-04-28· cited 18×
- State v. DunbarCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-09-27· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.