Supreme Court of South Carolina· 12/6/1999

State v. Missouri

Citations

524 S.E.2d 394
337 S.C. 548
1999 S.C. LEXIS 197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

applying Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978), and finding, inter alia, that evidence should be suppressed when it was obtained on the basis of a search warrant affidavit that excluded exculpatory information
“To be entitled to a Franks hearing for an alleged omission, the challenger must make a preliminary showing that the information in question was omitted with the intent to make, or in reckless disregard of whether it made, the affidavit misleading to the issuing judge.”
“To be entitled to a Franks hearing for an alleged omission, the challenger must make a preliminary showing that the information in question was omitted with the intent to make, or in reckless disregard of whether it made, the affidavit misleading to the issuing judge.”
adopting the two-prong Franks test
adopting the two-prong Franks test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Moore, Finney, Burnett, Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.