Oregon Supreme Court· 6/16/2005

State v. Shaw

Citations

113 P.3d 898
338 Or. 586
2005 Ore. LEXIS 340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

declining to apply OEC 404(4) on defendant’s appeal because to do so would violate ex post facto clause of Oregon Constitution
examining legislative history to determine general purpose of a statute to resolve ambiguity in one of its provisions
examining legislative history to determine general purpose of a statute to resolve ambiguity in one of its provisions
noting that trial courts have “broad discretion” under OEC 403
rejecting defendant’s invited-error argument where state’s argument was not urg- ing dismissal of indictment
stating standard of review applicable to trial court’s ruling under OEC 403

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.