Court of Appeals of Oregon· 6/18/2014

State v. Charles

Citations

263 Or. App. 578
331 P.3d 1012
2014 WL 2769106
2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 804

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding, in context of police stops, that “the officer’s giving of Miranda warnings is a factor to be considered in determining whether the officer’s actions conveyed a restraint on defendant’s liberty”
explaining that, we consider whether “all of the officer’s actions combine to form a whole greater than the sum of its parts” in determining whether “a reasonable person would believe that the officer had intentionally and significantly deprived defendant of his freedom of movement”
The “question is whether all of the officer’s actions combine to form a whole greater than the sum of its parts.”
in context, request to perform patdown implied that it was nec- essary because the defendant would remain in the officer’s presence for some time
determining a seizure occurred where circumstances added more

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hadlock, Ortega, Sercombe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.