Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/17/2001
State v. Berube
Citations
- 256 Conn. 742
- 775 A.2d 966
- 2001 Conn. LEXIS 281
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- failure to raise issue of severance at trial, with no indication failure not tactical, renders claim unreviewable
- claim that trial court improperly failed to sever charges stemming from two separate informations is nonconstitutional in nature
- failure to raise issue of severance at trial, with no indication failure not tactical, renders claim unreviewable
- “[t]he defendant, of course, may not require the trial court to search through the [department] file without first establishing a basis for his claim that it contains material evidence” [internal quotation marks omitted]
- discussing waiver of constitutional rights based on trial strategy
- discussing waiver of constitutional rights based on trial strategy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Norcott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-03-04· cited 110×
- State v. RiveraSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-04-06· cited 85×
- State v. ANGEL T.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-06-30· cited 67×
- State v. ConeySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-12-16· cited 56×
- State v. StasSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2012-09-12· cited 54×
- State v. AlstonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-01-11· cited 52×
- State v. ValedonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-08-13· cited 24×
- State v. CiccioConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-06-10· cited 19×
- State v. William C.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-07-16· cited 15×
- State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-11-20· cited 13×
- State v. VallejoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-07-24· cited 12×
- State v. CancelConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-04-01· cited 12×
- State v. DudleyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-02-26· cited 12×
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-11-15· cited 12×
- State v. McClellandConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-03-17· cited 11×
- State v. SantiagoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-10-29· cited 10×
- State v. KurankoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-08-20· cited 9×
- State v. MadoreConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-06-27· cited 8×
- State v. PerezConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-01-25· cited 6×
- State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-09-06· cited 6×
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
- Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court· 1980-06-10· cited 1,359×
- Wainwright v. GreenfieldSupreme Court· 1986-01-14· cited 752×
- Fletcher v. WeirSupreme Court· 1982-03-23· cited 749×
- State v. LeecanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-02-04· cited 192×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-03-10· cited 165×
- State v. KulmacSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-05· cited 159×
- State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-03· cited 157×
- State v. TaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-08-27· cited 140×
- United States v. Walter BarnesSeventh Circuit· 1991-11-19· cited 125×
- State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-10-17· cited 121×
- State v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-09-21· cited 107×
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-01-11· cited 100×
- State v. BolesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-18· cited 89×
- United States v. Phillip Cyprian and Leroy v. WilliamsSeventh Circuit· 1994-05-06· cited 81×
- State v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-04· cited 74×
- State v. ChanceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-02-13· cited 71×
- State v. GroomesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-03-28· cited 65×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.