Skip to main content

State v. Coleman

Citations

  • 26 P.3d 613
  • 271 Kan. 733
  • 2001 Kan. LEXIS 493

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • inferring that the district court found aggravating circumstances outweighed mitigating circumstances when tire district court made no comments regarding mitigating circumstances or whether the court weighed aggravating and mitigating circumstances
  • newly asserted theory involves only a question of law arising on proved or admitted facts and which is finally determinative of the case
  • \The presumption does not improperly shift the burden of proof to the defendant on any elements of the offenses\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allegrucci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.