Supreme Court of Kansas· 7/13/2001
State v. Coleman
Citations
- 26 P.3d 613
- 271 Kan. 733
- 2001 Kan. LEXIS 493
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- inferring that the district court found aggravating circumstances outweighed mitigating circumstances when tire district court made no comments regarding mitigating circumstances or whether the court weighed aggravating and mitigating circumstances
- newly asserted theory involves only a question of law arising on proved or admitted facts and which is finally determinative of the case
- \The presumption does not improperly shift the burden of proof to the defendant on any elements of the offenses\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allegrucci
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HittSupreme Court of Kansas· 2002-03-15· cited 98×
- State v. MonclaSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-03-06· cited 90×
- State v. KunellisSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-10-31· cited 70×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2002-05-31· cited 61×
- State v. MartisSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-02-06· cited 53×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-02-18· cited 51×
- People v. BeltranAppellate Court of Illinois· 2002-02-22· cited 44×
- State v. FlournoySupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-12-14· cited 29×
- State v. TylerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-09-05· cited 29×
- State v. DiggsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-10-26· cited 28×
- State v. HartpenceCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2002-03-22· cited 23×
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-10-31· cited 15×
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Kansas· 2020-09-11· cited 15×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-12-14· cited 13×
- State v. AstorgaSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-08-31· cited 7×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 3,585×
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-03-22· cited 2,202×
- State v. PabstSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-02-11· cited 246×
- State v. ConleySupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-10-27· cited 116×
- People v. ConatMichigan Court of Appeals· 2000-01-25· cited 100×
- State v. CornejoWashington Supreme Court· 1996-11-07· cited 97×
- In Re BootWashington Supreme Court· 1996-11-07· cited 88×
- State Ex Rel. Tomasic v. UNIFIED GOV. OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY/KANSAS CITYSupreme Court of Kansas· 1998-03-06· cited 73×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-12-10· cited 69×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-03-17· cited 60×
- State v. Angel C.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-06-23· cited 59×
- State v. MinceySupreme Court of Kansas· 1998-06-05· cited 57×
- State v. SimsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1998-05-29· cited 45×
- In the Interest of J.L.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1995-03-10· cited 43×
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1992-12-11· cited 42×
- State v. HumpherySupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-04-16· cited 35×
- People v. HughesColorado Court of Appeals· 1997-04-17· cited 25×
- State v. RutterSupreme Court of Kansas· 1993-04-16· cited 16×
- In Re the Welfare of L.J.S.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-11-14· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.