Supreme Court of Kansas· 6/5/1998

State v. Mincey

Citations

963 P.2d 403
265 Kan. 257
1998 Kan. LEXIS 380

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that the same test is used in determining whether offenses charged in a complaint or information constitute lesser included offenses and multiple charges
recognizing that the same test is used in determining whether offenses charged in a complaint or information constitute lesser included offenses and multiple charges
holding multiple punishments could not be imposed for multiple conspiracy convictions arising from a single agreement to commit multiple crimes
defendant “mistakenly assumed that Fike had expanded the traditional element test to determine if convictions are multiple punishments for the offenses”
whether a defendant can be convicted of two conspiracies based upon a single agreement to commit two distinct crimes is a question of law over which this court has unlimited review
K.S.A. 21-3107[1], now codified as K.S.A. 21-5109[a], prohibits multiple charges of the same crime in the complaint.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.