· 3/22/2002
State v. Hartpence
Citations
- 42 P.3d 1197
- 30 Kan. App. 2d 486
- 2002 Kan. App. LEXIS 285
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing Quincy Q. because “the adjudication [there] was resolved in juvenile court proceedings and then enhancement of sentence was applied following the resolution in juvenile court”
- “Here, we are dealing with a determination of in which court a juvenile will be tried for resolution of his or her case and not whether an individual will be sentenced beyond the statutory maximum. This decision is akin to a jurisdictional determination.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pierron, Johnson, Buchele
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.