Skip to main content
· 3/22/2002

State v. Hartpence

Citations

  • 42 P.3d 1197
  • 30 Kan. App. 2d 486
  • 2002 Kan. App. LEXIS 285

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing Quincy Q. because “the adjudication [there] was resolved in juvenile court proceedings and then enhancement of sentence was applied following the resolution in juvenile court”
  • “Here, we are dealing with a determination of in which court a juvenile will be tried for resolution of his or her case and not whether an individual will be sentenced beyond the statutory maximum. This decision is akin to a jurisdictional determination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pierron, Johnson, Buchele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.