· 12/14/2001
State v. Flournoy
Citations
- 36 P.3d 273
- 272 Kan. 784
- 2001 Kan. LEXIS 947
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant's act of shooting the victim five times within 1 minute was not especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel
- holding that the defendant’s act of shooting the victim five times within 1 minute was not especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel
- distinguishing itself from Alford and Brady because the shooting took place in 1 minute and the victim was not chased or forced to He on the floor awaiting death
- defendant would be the executor of the victim’s estate if exonerated for shooting his grandmother
- “ ‘The Kansas harmless error statute encompasses the federal harmless error and plain error rules.’ ” [Citations omitted.]
- “The erroneous admission of rebuttal evidence is not grounds for reversal unless discretion has been abused to defendant’s prejudice.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Six
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.