State v. Hardesty
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5744
Syllabus
CRIMINAL-CRIM.R. 29(A)-SUFFICIENCY-MANIFEST WEIGHT-FELONY SENTENCING-RESTITUTION - Appellant's convictions for aggravated burglary and felonious assault were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence; the bib-minimum and consecutive sentences imposed by the trial court were not contrary to law where the trial court considered all of the relevant sentencing factors, made the necessary findings, and imposed prison terms within the permitted range; the trial court's order of restitution was not contrary to law.
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.