Skip to main content

Stokes v. State

Citations

  • 548 So. 2d 188
  • 1989 WL 75313

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying, in part, on Dr. Orne’s repudiation of guidelines approach to hold hypnotically refreshed testimony inadmissible
  • relying, in part, on Dr. Orne's repudiation of guidelines approach to hold hypnotically refreshed testimony inadmissible
  • defining hypnosis as \an altered state of awareness or perception\ and finding that during hypnosis subject is placed in an artificially induced state of sleep or trance
  • adopting the standard from Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923
  • court conducted de novo review of scientific research and literature to assess general acceptance of hypnotically refreshed recollection of witness to crime
  • witness may testify to statements made before hypnosis if \properly recorded\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.