Supreme Court of Florida· 7/6/1989
Stokes v. State
Citations
- 548 So. 2d 188
- 1989 WL 75313
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- relying, in part, on Dr. Orne’s repudiation of guidelines approach to hold hypnotically refreshed testimony inadmissible
- relying, in part, on Dr. Orne's repudiation of guidelines approach to hold hypnotically refreshed testimony inadmissible
- defining hypnosis as \an altered state of awareness or perception\ and finding that during hypnosis subject is placed in an artificially induced state of sleep or trance
- adopting the standard from Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923
- court conducted de novo review of scientific research and literature to assess general acceptance of hypnotically refreshed recollection of witness to crime
- witness may testify to statements made before hypnosis if \properly recorded\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kogan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-12-31· cited 277×
- Brim v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-01-16· cited 113×
- Hadden v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-02-06· cited 113×
- Allen v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 2010-07-14· cited 107×
- Flanagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-09-09· cited 95×
- Engberg v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court· 1991-10-17· cited 84×
- State v. JohansSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-02-18· cited 81×
- Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-01-05· cited 72×
- Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-06-22· cited 70×
- Vining v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-04-28· cited 51×
- Roark v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2002-09-26· cited 51×
- State v. DuBrayMontana Supreme Court· 2003-09-23· cited 50×
- Marsh v. ValyouSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-11-21· cited 49×
- Vining v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-07-03· cited 48×
- United States v. HinesD. Massachusetts· 1999-06-11· cited 44×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-18· cited 39×
- Flanagan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-10-14· cited 38×
- Thorp v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-11-16· cited 37×
- Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-12-20· cited 33×
- Tavares David Calloway v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2017-01-26· cited 33×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1987-06-22· cited 2,329×
- State v. NeilSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-09-27· cited 507×
- State v. SlappySupreme Court of Florida· 1988-03-10· cited 333×
- People v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-03-11· cited 314×
- State v. HurdSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-07-14· cited 277×
- Galloway Farms, Inc. v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court· 1988-06-27· cited 217×
- State v. MacKSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-05-16· cited 207×
- Sireci v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 144×
- Commonwealth v. NazarovitchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-10-29· cited 141×
- Bundy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-05-09· cited 135×
- State v. MenaArizona Supreme Court· 1981-02-03· cited 122×
- Harding v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-10-09· cited 113×
- Bundy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-06-21· cited 113×
- People v. SmrekarAppellate Court of Illinois· 1979-01-30· cited 94×
- Hansbrough v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1987-06-18· cited 81×
- Chester Lee Wicker v. O.L. McCotter Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsFifth Circuit· 1986-02-18· cited 78×
- State v. PalmerNebraska Supreme Court· 1981-12-18· cited 73×
- State v. CoeWashington Supreme Court· 1988-01-28· cited 72×
- Shapiro v. CookeSupreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 67×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.