Washington Supreme Court· 6/7/1984
State v. Martin
Citations
- 684 P.2d 651
- 101 Wash. 2d 713
- 1984 Wash. LEXIS 1679
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding same regarding hypnosis evidence
- hypnotized witness may testify as to facts recalled before hypnosis as long as detailed record of pre-hypnotic memory is preserved
- witness may only testify to facts recalled prior to hypnosis
- also filed the same day as the first Coe opinion
- also filed the same day as the first Coe opinion
- testimony as to prehypnotic memory admissible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dore, Stafford, Brachtenbach, Dolliver, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1987-06-22· cited 2,329×
- State v. GentryWashington Supreme Court· 1995-01-25· cited 498×
- Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 407×
- State v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court· 1988-10-05· cited 376×
- State v. CoeWashington Supreme Court· 1984-06-07· cited 231×
- State v. OrtizWashington Supreme Court· 1992-06-11· cited 215×
- State v. CauthronWashington Supreme Court· 1993-02-25· cited 207×
- In re the Detention of ThorellWashington Supreme Court· 2003-07-10· cited 203×
- State v. JanesWashington Supreme Court· 1993-04-08· cited 195×
- State v. BlackWashington Supreme Court· 1987-11-05· cited 192×
- State v. LaureanoWashington Supreme Court· 1984-06-07· cited 138×
- State v. AllenWashington Supreme Court· 2013-01-24· cited 119×
- State v. PollittSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-08-25· cited 108×
- State v. FordWashington Supreme Court· 1988-06-02· cited 98×
- People v. RomeroSupreme Court of Colorado· 1987-11-09· cited 84×
- Engberg v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court· 1991-10-17· cited 84×
- State v. TuttleUtah Supreme Court· 1989-04-12· cited 79×
- State v. BaityWashington Supreme Court· 2000-02-03· cited 75×
- State v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-01-11· cited 75×
- State Of Washington v. Jorge Luis LizarragaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-12-07· cited 75×
Cites
49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-06-07· cited 3,001×
- People v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-03-11· cited 314×
- State v. HurdSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-07-14· cited 277×
- State v. MacKSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-05-16· cited 207×
- United States v. Herman Franks, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Max Britton, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Boyce MitchellSixth Circuit· 1975-06-23· cited 185×
- State Ex Rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-05-04· cited 181×
- People v. HughesNew York Court of Appeals· 1983-07-05· cited 170×
- Commonwealth v. NazarovitchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-10-29· cited 141×
- United States v. James MillerSecond Circuit· 1969-03-14· cited 127×
- State v. MenaArizona Supreme Court· 1981-02-03· cited 122×
- Awkard v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 122×
- Harding v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-10-09· cited 113×
- United States v. Lamar Adams, United States of America v. James Lee PinkertonNinth Circuit· 1978-08-28· cited 105×
- United States v. AwkardNinth Circuit· 1979-04-23· cited 103×
- Commonwealth v. KaterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-03-23· cited 100×
- Chapman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1982-01-14· cited 96×
- People v. SmrekarAppellate Court of Illinois· 1979-01-30· cited 94×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.