Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no misstatement of law in special verdict form where accompanying jury instruction set forth proper law
• preempting inadequate warnings and instructions claims, products liability claims based on the label, and failure to warn claims
• without expressly stating “substantial factor test,” the court required the plaintiff to prove that an individual defendant used a pesticide that became part of the drifting pesticide cloud that caused plaintiff’s damages
• FIFRA preempts claim based on implied warranty of merchantability
• rejecting argument that special verdict form conflicted with other instructions
• a jury instruction contains a legal error if it does not allow a party to argue his or her theory of the case, misleads the jury, or, when considered with other jury instructions as a whole, improperly informs the jury of the applicable law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).