Skip to main content

State v. Cassidy

Citations

  • 331 Or. App. 69
  • 545 P.3d 203

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that to preserve an argument in the context of an MJOA, a defendant must state the specific theory on which the state’s proof was insufficient
  • explaining that to preserve an argument in the context of an MJOA, a defendant must state the specific theory on which the state’s proof was insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.