Skip to main content

State v. Krieger

Citations

  • 422 P.3d 300
  • 291 Or. App. 450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, in the absence of a sufficient offer of proof, the defen- dant had not “provided this court with a record from which we can determine whether the error—if any—was harm- less”
  • explaining that offer of proof is required to permit Court of Appeals to determine whether exclusion of evidence is harmless or not
  • observing that we will not presume harmfulness in the absence of an offer of proof
  • party claiming evidentiary error must develop record sufficient to evaluate whether any error is harmless
  • “Under [OEC 103], no offer of proof is necessary when the nature of the excluded evidence is adequately reflected in the argument of counsel to the court.”
  • defendant’s failure to provide an offer of proof, either with a narrative statement about the potential testimony or with the witness’s actual testimony in the jury’s absence, prevented this court from determining whether evidentiary error was harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Devore, James, Lagesen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.