State v. Drown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, for purposes of ORS 163.205, the standard of withholding necessary and adequate physical care “can be satisfied by withholding care for a condition that causes or will cause serious physi- cal pain or injury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Murillo-Chavez v. Bondi
  Ninth Circuit· 2025-02-13· cited 17×
• State v. Sparks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-11-26· cited 11×
• State v. Cassidy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-02-22· cited 8×
• State v. Burciaga
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-06-11· cited 6×
• State v. Sylva
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-22· cited 4×
• Drown v. Persson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-11-07· cited 2×
• State v. Goetzinger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-09· cited 2×
• State v. Hickey
  Lane County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-05-11· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• State v. Gaines
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
• Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific Transportation
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-03-13· cited 196×
• Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific Transportation
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-05-08· cited 171×
• State v. Haugen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-11-04· cited 30×
• State v. Paragon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-09-15· cited 29×
• Charles v. Palomo
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-02-19· cited 26×
• State v. Baker-Krofft
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-08-19· cited 23×
• State v. Bordeaux
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-05-21· cited 14×
• State v. McCants
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-11-04· cited 11×